LEG LENGTH AND TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT
0 Comments Published by Dr. William Barrett July 1st, 2009 in PerspectiveThe goals of hip replacement include the relief of pain secondary to various forms of arthritis, restoration of function, providing a stable hip with a functional range of motion and as close as possible normalizing leg length. These goals are met by first obtaining stable fixation of the acetabular (cup) and femoral (stem) components to the bone. This is accomplished by appropriate surgical technique and use of reliable implants. Stable range of motion depends on many factors including, component related factors and patient related factors. Restoration of leg length is a function of the size of the implant used, the soft tissue tension around the hip joint, a level pelvis and relatively straight spine. When patients note a difference in length after surgery there ere are several factors that come into play. These include, normalization of length from a previously shortened hip that was due to loss of the joint surface, soft tissue tightness about the hip that can cause contractures in one direction or another, and ongoing or acquired pelvic obliquity that can tip the pelvis in one direction thereby causing an apparent leg length difference, when the true difference is in fact minimal. One of the common initiators of concerns about leg length is attempts at measuring the leg length with the patient lying down. This is often very inaccurate and can lead to inappropriate concerns about length.
Patients undergoing hip replacement should work first and foremost on healing their soft tissue, restoring their function, and if concerns about length are present, discussing them with their doctor and reviewing the possible etiologies including, pelvic obliquity, soft tissue contracture, and true skeletal length differences. A collaborative effort to discuss and resolve these issues often leads to a very satisfactory outcome.
The Debate Continues, Surface Replacement
0 Comments Published by Dr. William Barrett June 29th, 2009 in PerspectiveNATIONAL JOINT REGISTRIES
0 Comments Published by Dr. William Barrett April 27th, 2009 in PerspectiveLINK BETWEEN OBESITY AND RISK OF OSTEOARTHRITIS
3 Comments Published by Dr. William Barrett April 15th, 2009 in PerspectiveCOMPARISON OF LARGE HEAD METAL-ON-METAL TOTAL HIPS WITH HIP RESURFACING
0 Comments Published by Dr. William Barrett April 8th, 2009 in PerspectiveNEW DIRECTION IN KNEE REPLACEMENT DESIGN
3 Comments Published by Dr. William Barrett April 3rd, 2009 in PerspectiveHIP PAIN IN THE YOUNG INDIVIDUAL
0 Comments Published by Dr. William Barrett March 23rd, 2009 in PerspectiveFACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH INFECTION AFTER JOINT REPLACEMENT
0 Comments Published by Dr. William Barrett March 16th, 2009 in Perspective
Search
About
Dr. Barrett is a member of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. He has lectured and published widely.
Latest
- LEG LENGTH AND TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT
- The Debate Continues, Surface Replacement
- PURPOSE OF A JOINT REGISTRY
- NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRIES
- LINK BETWEEN OBESITY AND RISK OF OSTEOARTHRITIS
- COMPARISON OF LARGE HEAD METAL-ON-METAL TOTAL HIPS WITH HIP RESURFACING
- NEW DIRECTION IN KNEE REPLACEMENT DESIGN
- HIP PAIN IN THE YOUNG INDIVIDUAL
- FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH INFECTION AFTER JOINT REPLACEMENT
- What Is Ahead For 2009?
My Favorite Links
Valley Medical Center
Valley Orthopedic Associates
Why I'm a Surgeon
